“Bad Juror” Lists

Posted by Seth Chazin | Dec 20, 2012 | 0 Comments


Obtaining “Bad Juror” lists that are produced by prosecutor offices.

A little known practice of many prosecutor offices is the use of “bad juror” lists to exclude particular citizens from jury service. The individuals on this list have been identified by the prosecutors as bad jurors for a variety of reasons.

For example, a District Attorney's office in Texas is believed to use a bad juror list to strike jurors who are against the death penalty. This practice not only interferes with an open and fair jury selection process, but also violates potential jurors' rights to serve in this important capacity.

The biggest problem is that a defendant's right to be tried by a fair cross-section of the general public is diminished. One method of combating this practice is to demand the disclosure of these lists through discovery.  Ira P.

Ira P. Robbins offers an interesting perspective on the defense's right to these lists in his recent article in the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy.

About the Author

Seth Chazin

Seth P. Chazin has aggressively defended clients in thousands of felony and misdemeanor cases for over 25 years. He has extensive experience representing criminal defendants in federal and state court, while handling both state and federal appeals as well.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

The Law Office

Chazin logo new dark

Seth P. Chazin is a San Francisco Bay Area Criminal Defense Lawyer with over 30 years experience.

Super Lawyer

Superlawyercapture orig compressor

Seth P. Chazin is recognized by Super Lawyer. Super Lawyers® is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. This recognition is earned only by the top 5% of attorneys in the state. The selection process for Super Lawyers has many steps and includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations. Each candidate is evaluated on 12 indicators of peer recognition and professional achievement. Selections are made on an annual, state-by-state basis. To learn more about the selection process, click here.