July 2021
Our client in Stockton, California was under investigation for possession and distribution of child pornography. After numerous contacts with the Lodi Police Department and a thorough investigation, gathering of impeachment evidence of the reporting party and aggressive negotiations with the San... Read On
July 2021
Our client in San Francisco, California was under investigation for possession of child pornography. After taking an aggressive approach and numerous contacts with the San Francisco Police Department and San Francisco District Attorney's office, no criminal charges were filed. Read On
July 2021
Thanks to aggressive negotiations, our client (from an immigrant family and first in his family to go to college) in Hercules was only charged with a misdemeanor violation of Penal Code Section 484 - (Petty Theft) after embezzling items that could have brought a felony charge. Further negotiatio... Read On
July 2021
Our client was arrested in Milpitas and charged in Santa Clara County Superior Court with a misdemeanor violation of Penal Code Section 647(b) – (Solicitation of Prostitution). We negotiated for an offer of diversion, the case was ultimately dismissed and our client's petition to seal his arrest ... Read On
April 2021
Our client in San Francisco was under investigation for sexual assault. After taking an aggressive approach and numerous contacts with the San Francisco Police Department, the San Francisco District Attorney's Office and the Alameda County District Attorney Office's, no charges were filed. Read On
April 2021
In San Francisco, client was under investigation for possession of child pornography. After numerous contacts with the San Francisco Police Department and the San Francisco District Attorney's Office , no charges filed. Read On
April 2021
Our client in Corning, California was under investigation for possession of child pornography. After conveying an extremely strong mitigation case and taking an aggressive approach to the with the Tehama County District Attorney's Office, no criminal charges were filed. Read On
March 2021
Our client in Cupertino, California, was under investigation for possession and distribution of child pornography (18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). No Charges Filed Read On
March 2021
Our client was arrested in Berkeley for two counts misdemeanor violation of Penal Code Section 594(a) – (Vandalism Over $400 Damage). No charges were filed and client was granted petition to seal his arrest record pursuant to Penal Code Section 851.91 in Alameda County Superior Court. Read On
February 2021
Our Alameda County client was charged with a felony violation of Penal Code Section 273a(A) - Child Endangerment. The court granted our motion for early termination of probation, petition for a dismissal pursuant to Penal Code Section 1203.4 and charges were reduced to a misdemeanor pursuant to ... Read On
February 2021
Our client in Emeryville, California was under investigation for possession of child pornography. After taking an aggressive approach on the case with the Emeryville Police Department and the Alameda County District Attorney's Office, no criminal charges were filed. Our motion for return of pro... Read On
January 2021
Our client in San Mateo, California, was under investigation in Montgomery County, Texas for possible federal charges of possession of child pornography and child exploitation (18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). After aggressive representation and numerous contacts with the ... Read On
January 2021
Our client in Hayward, California, was under investigation by the FBI for possession of child pornography (18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). After an aggressive defense and numerous contacts with the United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California, n... Read On
January 2021
Our client in Valley Village, Los Angeles, California, was under investigation in the Northern District of California for possible federal charges of possession of child pornography (18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). After numerous contacts with the Federal Bureau of Invest... Read On
January 2021
Our client in Booneville, California, was under investigation in the Northern District of California (San Francisco Division) for possible federal charges of possession of child pornography (18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). After aggressive representation and numerous cont... Read On
January 2021
Placer County client convicted of a felony violation of Penal Code Section 4532(a)(1) – (Escape from Jail). The Placer County Superior Court granted our motion for early termination of probation, reduced the conviction to a misdemeanor and granted our petition for dismissed pursuant to Penal Code... Read On
November 2020
Client arrested in Oakland, Alameda County for a misdemeanor violation of Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) – (driving under the influence of an alcoholic beverage) and violation of Vehicle Code Section 23152(b) – (driving with a blood alcohol of .08% or higher). Despite the fact that client had TWO... Read On
September 2020
Our Berkeley client was charged with a misdemeanor violation of Penal Code Section 484 - (Petty Theft). Creative negotiations with the Alameda County District Attorney's Office led to a dismissal of charges pursuant to a civil compromise. Read On
August 2020
Our client in Aptos, California, was under investigation for possession of child pornography (18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). After numerous contacts with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, no charges were filed. Read On
August 2020
Our client was accused of rape by a fellow student at an Ivy League university. The accuser posted numerous posts and enlisted many supporters online. After a thorough investigation and negotiations with the accuser and her family, the accuser recanted, no charges filed. Read On
“The death penalty is a lie, a misguided mistake born of anger and frustration. Capital punishment has become a perverse monument to inequality, to how some lives matter and others do not. It is a violent example of how we protect and value the rich and abandon and devalue the poor. The death penalty is a grim, disturbing shadow formed by the legacy of racial apartheid and bias against the poor that condemns the disfavored among us, but corrupts us all. It’s the perverse symbol elected officials use to strengthen their ‘tough on crime’ reputations and distract us from confronting the causes of violence. It is finally the enemy of grace, redemption and all of us who recognize that each person is more than their worse act.”
