Free Consultation 1-800-499-9902


New Laws to Protect Email Privacy

Posted by Seth Chazin | Jul 12, 2013 | 0 Comments

New laws would require authorities to obtain warrants before accessing user e-mails

There have been several promising signs that Fourth Amendment protections are catching up to e-mail communications. Under current federal law, e-mail messages that are 180 days old or less and unopened are subject to a warrant for law enforcement to access them. Older e-mails and those that have been opened can be sought through court orders or subpoenas, which are subject to a much lower standard.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D – CA, and others in Congress are pushing an overhaul of the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act that will include a warrant requirement for all e-mails held by service providers. Senators Mike Lee, R – UT, and Patrick Leahy, D – VT, have introduced similar bills in the senate.

California State Senator Mark Leno introduced legislation that would require state law enforcement to obtain a warrant before accessing data from communication services such as Gmail, Outlook, Facebook and Twitter.

Lastly, the Department of Justice has dropped its opposition to the proposed updates to federal laws. Read more about email privacy here.

About the Author

Seth Chazin

Seth P. Chazin has aggressively defended clients in thousands of felony and misdemeanor cases for over 30 years. He has extensive experience representing criminal defendants in federal and state court, while handling both state and federal appeals as well.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment


“The death penalty is a lie, a misguided mistake born of anger and frustration. Capital punishment has become a perverse monument to inequality, to how some lives matter and others do not. It is a violent example of how we protect and value the rich and abandon and devalue the poor. The death penalty is a grim, disturbing shadow formed by the legacy of racial apartheid and bias against the poor that condemns the disfavored among us, but corrupts us all. It’s the perverse symbol elected officials use to strengthen their ‘tough on crime’ reputations and distract us from confronting the causes of violence. It is finally the enemy of grace, redemption and all of us who recognize that each person is more than their worse act.”
- Bryan Stevenson