Free Consultation 1-800-499-9902


New Laws to Protect Email Privacy

Posted by Seth Chazin | Jul 12, 2013 | 2 Comments

New laws would require authorities to obtain warrants before accessing user e-mails

There have been several promising signs that Fourth Amendment protections are catching up to e-mail communications. Under current federal law, e-mail messages that are 180 days old or less and unopened are subject to a warrant for law enforcement to access them. Older e-mails and those that have been opened can be sought through court orders or subpoenas, which are subject to a much lower standard.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D – CA, and others in Congress are pushing an overhaul of the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act that will include a warrant requirement for all e-mails held by service providers. Senators Mike Lee, R – UT, and Patrick Leahy, D – VT, have introduced similar bills in the senate.

California State Senator Mark Leno introduced legislation that would require state law enforcement to obtain a warrant before accessing data from communication services such as Gmail, Outlook, Facebook and Twitter.

Lastly, the Department of Justice has dropped its opposition to the proposed updates to federal laws. Read more about email privacy here.

About the Author

Seth Chazin

Seth P. Chazin has aggressively defended clients in thousands of felony and misdemeanor cases for over 25 years. He has extensive experience representing criminal defendants in federal and state court, while handling both state and federal appeals as well.


Jacob I. Kiani Reply

Posted Jul 13, 2013 at 01:04:24

This is fascinating mainly because I can’t believe it’s suddenly such a novel idea in the country’s eyes that we would expect that our emails remain private, free from the prying eyes of government agents.

I have written about what level of privacy employees should expect to enjoy with regard to their work email here:

I understand why an employee necessarily must expect to enjoy less of a right to privacy in work email accounts using company-provided computers and equipment, but I think all American citizens should reasonably expect to enjoy enough privacy in their own personal email accounts accessed at home to prevent the prying eyes of government from reading any email they want simply by asking Verizon or AT&T to hand it over.

Your thoughts? Do you think the above-described legislative efforts will ultimately be successful?

Seth Chazin Reply

Posted Jul 19, 2013 at 11:28:46

I don’t think that this is necessarily a novel idea at all on the part of the American people. Instead, what has happened is that, thanks to those like Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning, people are just learning for the first time that their constitutional Right to Privacy and other Fourth Amendment Rights have been abrogated by the government and various companies for some time. Now that these abuses have been exposed, the public is outraged and Congress is having to act quickly. I have written on other Fourth Amendment abuses that are occurring daily very close to home, like in Oakland, California. See or

Leave a Comment


“The death penalty is a lie, a misguided mistake born of anger and frustration. Capital punishment has become a perverse monument to inequality, to how some lives matter and others do not. It is a violent example of how we protect and value the rich and abandon and devalue the poor. The death penalty is a grim, disturbing shadow formed by the legacy of racial apartheid and bias against the poor that condemns the disfavored among us, but corrupts us all. It’s the perverse symbol elected officials use to strengthen their ‘tough on crime’ reputations and distract us from confronting the causes of violence. It is finally the enemy of grace, redemption and all of us who recognize that each person is more than their worse act.”
- Bryan Stevenson