Trial Of Garcia Zarate, An Undocumented Immigrant Accused Of Killing Kate Steinle, Raises Important and Interesting Legal Issues Regarding Intent

Posted by Seth Chazin | Nov 21, 2017 | 0 Comments

800px supremecourtofcaliforniamaincourthouse
CC-BY-SA-3.0 Coolcaesar

Judge Samuel Feng of the San Francisco Superior Court has begun the process of instructing the jury in the trial of the People vs. Jose Ines Garcia Zarate and has told members of the jury that they are ‘the sole judges of the evidence.'  The jury has been reminded of the charges against Garcia Zarate - Penal Code Section 187 murder in the second-degree, Penal Code Section 245 assault with a semi automatic weapon, and Penal Code Section 27920 possession of a firearm. The jury was also reminded that they can find the defendant guilty of first-degree or second degree murder, involuntary manslaughter, or decide on a not guilty verdict. Judge Feng told them that they should not let bias, sympathy, race, or any other similar factor influence their decision.

These instructions were followed by the prosecution's closing argument. Assistant District Attorney Diana Garcia's argument lasted 70 minutes, and maintained that on the night of July 1, 2015, Garcia Zarate took a concealed gun to Pier 14 in San Francisco and played ‘his own secret version of Russian Roulette.'

The Defense then presented their closing arguments and maintained that Garcia Zarate found the gun, and when he lifted it, it accidentally fired, ricocheted off the ground before traveling 78 feet and hitting Kate Steinle. They asked for an acquittal, declaring that Zarate did not have any intent to kill.

The gun was stolen by an unknown person from the personal vehicle of a Federal Park Ranger four days before the shooting. The Park Ranger was an agent of the Bureau of Land Management. The Steinle family is suing the Bureau.

If the jury finds that Zarate had the intent to kill Steinle and he is found guilty of second-degree murder, Garcia Zarate faces 15 years to life in prison. If they find that there was premeditation associated with his intent to kill her, Zarate faces 25 to life. If the jury finds that the killing was not intentional, but accidental based on a grossly negligent act of Zarate, the jury can find him guilty of involuntary manslaughter.

His case has gained notoriety due to his status as an undocumented immigrant. He had been transferred to San Francisco's jail in March 2015 to face a 20 year old charge for selling marijuana. There was a request to detain him for deportation, however, the San Francisco Sheriff's Department released him after the marijuana charge had been dropped.

President Trump has unfortunately used this case as a justification to restrict immigration and to withhold federal funding from cities with sanctuary city laws, like San Francisco.

Further Reading:

CBS SF Bay Area: Prosecutor: Steinle Shooter Played ‘Russian Roulette’

CNN: Trial of undocumented immigrant in Kate Steinle killing nears end

KTVZ: Trial of undocumented immigrant in Kate Steinle killing nears end

ABC7 News: Judge in Kate Steinle murder trial instructs jury on deliberation process

About the Author

Seth Chazin

Seth P. Chazin has aggressively defended clients in thousands of felony and misdemeanor cases for over 25 years. He has extensive experience representing criminal defendants in federal and state court, while handling both state and federal appeals as well.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

The Law Office

Chazin logo new dark

Seth P. Chazin is a San Francisco Bay Area Criminal Defense Lawyer with over 30 years experience.

Super Lawyer

Superlawyercapture orig compressor

Seth P. Chazin is recognized by Super Lawyer. Super Lawyers® is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. This recognition is earned only by the top 5% of attorneys in the state. The selection process for Super Lawyers has many steps and includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations. Each candidate is evaluated on 12 indicators of peer recognition and professional achievement. Selections are made on an annual, state-by-state basis. To learn more about the selection process, click here.